Rate the feasibilty each ABM for use with piglets (pre-weaning)
Welcome
Feasibility reflects the ease of recording, resources required, and the ability to record the ABM under field conditions (within a 1-day visit).
The definition is based on Llonch et al. (2015) which proposed three levels of feasibility for each ABM:
- High feasibility = easy and quick recording without any special needs/tools or resources (money or training)
- Medium feasibility = extra time, tools or resources needed for recording (but do-able within a 1-day visit)
- Low feasibility = very difficult to record under field conditions and/or within a 1-day visit
However, in this exercise you will be asked to rate the feasibility of using an ABM for dry sows and gilts using a continuous scale ranging from 0–100. This scale will be tagged with the Low, Medium and High to assist in the rating process.
Top begin, please enter your details, then click Start.
Step 1: Rank ABMs on feasibility
The items are pre-allocated to High, Medium, and Low based on the consensus meeting. Please reorder within each box only (drag up/down). Moving items between boxes is disabled.
High Impact
Medium Impact
Low Impact
Step 2: Rate ABMs on their feasibility
Rate each item from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). Use keyboard left/right when a bar is focused.
High
Medium
Low
Thank you
Your responses are ready. Please download your results and email the file to Heleen.
Filename includes your name, date, and the dimension: impact.
